Introduction. Appreciations Of Sun Tzu
*
"The Art of War", by Lionel Giles, [1910],
Appreciations Of Sun Tz.
Sun Tz has exercised a potent fascination over the minds of some of China s greatest men. Among the famous generals who are known to have studied his pages with enthusiasm may be mentioned # Han Hsin ("d". B.c. 196), 2 # Fng I ("d". A.d. 34), 3 # L Mng ("d". 219), 4 and # Yo Fei (1103-1141). 5 The opinion of Ts'ao Kung, who disputes with Han Hsin the highest place in Chinese military annals, has already been recorded. 6 Still more remarkable, in one way, is the testimony of purely literary men, such as # Su Hsn (the father of Su Tung-p'o), who wrote several essays on military topics, all of which owe their chief inspiration to Sun Tz. The following short passage by him is preserved in the "Y Hai:" 7--
p. xliii
Sun Wu's saying, that in war one cannot make certain of conquering, 1 is very different indeed from what other books tell us. 2 Wu Ch'i was a man of the same stamp as Sun Wu: they both wrote books on war, and they are linked together in popular speech as "Sun and Wu." But Wu Ch'i's remarks on war are less weighty, his rules are rougher and more crudely stated, and there is not the same unity of plan as in Sun Tz's work, where the style is terse, but the meaning fully brought out. 3
The #, ch. 17, contains the following extract from the # "Impartial Judgments in the Garden of Literature" by # Chng Hou:--
Sun Tz's 13 chapters are not only the staple and base of all military men's training, but also compel the most careful attention of scholars and men of letters. His sayings are terse yet elegant, simple yet profound, perspicuous and eminently practical. Such works as the "Lun Y", the "I Ching" and the great Commentary, 4 as well as the writings of Mencius, Hsn K'uang and Yang Chu, all fall below the level of Sun Tz. 5
Chu Hsi, commenting on this, fully admits the first part of the criticism, although he dislikes the audacious comparison with the venerated classical works. Language of this sort, he says, "encourages a ruler's bent towards unrelenting warfare and reckless militarism." 6
Footnotes
xlii:2 "See" p. 144.
xlii:3 "Hou Han Shu", ch. 17 "ad init".
xlii:4 "San Kuo Chih", ch. 54, f. 10 "v" (commentary).
xlii:5 "Sung Shih", ch. 365 "ad init".
xlii:6 The few Europeans who have yet had an opportunity of acquainting themselves with Sun Tz are not behindhand in their praise. In this connection, I may perhaps be excused for quoting from a letter from Lord Roberts, to whom the sheets of the present work were submitted previous to publication: "Many of Sun Wu's maxims are perfectly applicable to the present day, and no. 11 on page 77 is one that the people of this country would do well to take to heart."
xlii:7 Ch. 540, f. 13 "r".
xliii:1 "See" Iv. 3.
xliii:2 The allusion may be to Mencius VI. 2. ix. 2: #.
xliii:3 #.
xliii:4 The "Tso Chuan".
xliii:5 #.
xliii:6 #.
"The Art of War", by Lionel Giles, [1910],
Appreciations Of Sun Tz.
Sun Tz has exercised a potent fascination over the minds of some of China s greatest men. Among the famous generals who are known to have studied his pages with enthusiasm may be mentioned # Han Hsin ("d". B.c. 196), 2 # Fng I ("d". A.d. 34), 3 # L Mng ("d". 219), 4 and # Yo Fei (1103-1141). 5 The opinion of Ts'ao Kung, who disputes with Han Hsin the highest place in Chinese military annals, has already been recorded. 6 Still more remarkable, in one way, is the testimony of purely literary men, such as # Su Hsn (the father of Su Tung-p'o), who wrote several essays on military topics, all of which owe their chief inspiration to Sun Tz. The following short passage by him is preserved in the "Y Hai:" 7--
p. xliii
Sun Wu's saying, that in war one cannot make certain of conquering, 1 is very different indeed from what other books tell us. 2 Wu Ch'i was a man of the same stamp as Sun Wu: they both wrote books on war, and they are linked together in popular speech as "Sun and Wu." But Wu Ch'i's remarks on war are less weighty, his rules are rougher and more crudely stated, and there is not the same unity of plan as in Sun Tz's work, where the style is terse, but the meaning fully brought out. 3
The #, ch. 17, contains the following extract from the # "Impartial Judgments in the Garden of Literature" by # Chng Hou:--
Sun Tz's 13 chapters are not only the staple and base of all military men's training, but also compel the most careful attention of scholars and men of letters. His sayings are terse yet elegant, simple yet profound, perspicuous and eminently practical. Such works as the "Lun Y", the "I Ching" and the great Commentary, 4 as well as the writings of Mencius, Hsn K'uang and Yang Chu, all fall below the level of Sun Tz. 5
Chu Hsi, commenting on this, fully admits the first part of the criticism, although he dislikes the audacious comparison with the venerated classical works. Language of this sort, he says, "encourages a ruler's bent towards unrelenting warfare and reckless militarism." 6
Footnotes
xlii:2 "See" p. 144.
xlii:3 "Hou Han Shu", ch. 17 "ad init".
xlii:4 "San Kuo Chih", ch. 54, f. 10 "v" (commentary).
xlii:5 "Sung Shih", ch. 365 "ad init".
xlii:6 The few Europeans who have yet had an opportunity of acquainting themselves with Sun Tz are not behindhand in their praise. In this connection, I may perhaps be excused for quoting from a letter from Lord Roberts, to whom the sheets of the present work were submitted previous to publication: "Many of Sun Wu's maxims are perfectly applicable to the present day, and no. 11 on page 77 is one that the people of this country would do well to take to heart."
xlii:7 Ch. 540, f. 13 "r".
xliii:1 "See" Iv. 3.
xliii:2 The allusion may be to Mencius VI. 2. ix. 2: #.
xliii:3 #.
xliii:4 The "Tso Chuan".
xliii:5 #.
xliii:6 #.
